Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings AMIA Symposium ; 2022:1052-1061, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2304616

ABSTRACT

We propose a relational graph to incorporate clinical similarity between patients while building personalized clinical event predictors with a focus on hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Our graph formation process fuses heterogeneous data, i.e., chest X-rays as node features and non-imaging EHR for edge formation. While node represents a snap-shot in time for a single patient, weighted edge structure encodes complex clinical patterns among patients. While age and gender have been used in the past for patient graph formation, our method incorporates complex clinical history while avoiding manual feature selection. The model learns from the patient's own data as well as patterns among clinically-similar patients. Our visualization study investigates the effects of ‘neighborhood' of a node on its predictiveness and showcases the model's tendency to focus on edge-connected patients with highly suggestive clinical features common with the node. The proposed model generalizes well by allowing edge formation process to adapt to an external cohort.

3.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 17(3): e377-e385, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-983894

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The response to the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the management of patients with cancer. In this pooled retrospective analysis, we describe changes in management patterns for patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19 in two academic institutions in the San Francisco Bay Area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with a current or historical diagnosis of malignancy were identified from the electronic medical record at the University of California, San Francisco, and Stanford University. The proportion of patients undergoing active cancer management whose care was affected was quantified and analyzed for significant differences with regard to management type, treatment intent, and the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. The duration and characteristics of such changes were compared across subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included, of whom 55 were undergoing active cancer management. Of these, 35 of 55 (64%) had significant changes in management that consisted primarily of delays. An additional three patients not undergoing active cancer management experienced a delay in management after being diagnosed with COVID-19. The decision to change management was correlated with the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, with more delays identified in patients treated with palliative intent earlier in the course of the pandemic (March/April 2020) compared with later (May/June 2020) (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.03 to 17.3; P = .0497). This difference was not seen among patients treated with curative intent during the same timeframe. CONCLUSION: We found significant changes in the management of cancer patients with COVID-19 treated with curative and palliative intent that evolved over time. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of changes in management and treatment on cancer outcomes for patients with cancer and COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , COVID-19/therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , California , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Palliative Care , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL